Monday, September 29, 2008

"Declaration for Today" by Brent Mesick

(I realize I'm a couple months late sharing this, but I felt it was important to put out there since it is something we should be thinking about throughout the year.)


Today is the two hundred and thirty-second anniversary of the Continental Congress’ adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Rarely do we reflect on the content of the Declaration. We should reflect today, more than on any other Independence Day anniversary, after terrible breaches of trust, breaches of our rights by our government, what was declared so clearly and directly on July 4, 1776.

1. The first sentence of the Declaration states it is a matter of natural law that people have the ability to take on political independence, “to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another” and govern themselves.

2. The next section, the preamble, asserts that people have certain rights. When a government violates these rights, the people have the right to “alter or abolish” that government. This is often called the “right of revolution”. It states clearly “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

3. The third section lists the charges establishing King George’s violations of the colonists’ rights, proving him unfit to rule. Interestingly, charges included: “He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power”, “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury”, and “For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences”.

4. The next section states disappointment that attempts by colonists and British citizens to mediate with King George were unsuccessful.

5. The final section is the conclusion that, there being conditions under which people must change their government and that the British have produced these conditions, the American Colonies must absolve allegiance with the British Crown and establish free and independent states.

We’ve already plunged into the Fourth of July weekend, full of nationalistic fervor and, perhaps, a sense of entitlement. Flags are flying and fireworks coloring the night sky as if to shed light on what it means to be a nation sprung from the rights asserted in the Declaration of Independence. These celebrations, however, commemorate the ideals themselves, not whether we reach them. When the fireworks end, we’ll see the darkness of a patriotism made jingoistic through corporate governance, neo-imperialism and harsh immigration policies. We’ll see political representation muted by a (practically) two-party system where the candidates separate themselves through rhetoric, but unite on policy such as corporate-favoring trade (NAFTA), domestic spying (new FISA legislation), and tax-funded religious programs.

Today, now more than ever, we must reflect on the courage of those who declared the unalienable rights of people. We must be prepared to defend those rights and the rights enumerated in the Constitution and it’s amendments - especially the Bill of Rights. We must reject governmental infiltration and surveillance of peace groups, the power of the President and the Secretary of Defense to deem anyone an enemy combatant, the imprisoning of people without charge, the torturing and outsourcing to torturers, and the declarations of the President to be above the law. We must understand that because of these and other egregious assaults on our civil rights, we are marginalized from the political process, that the anti-war mindset held by the majority of Americans is disregarded, that by the stripping of rights we become powerless.

We should see, and act. We can begin with the election. Of these achingly similar presidential candidates, who can be influenced the most? How can we influence them? After the whirlwind romance of the election season, how will we ensure we are not cuckolded by a candidate too ready for corporate smooth-talk? Of candidates for all offices, how do they stand on civil liberties?

Next year, we will celebrate the Fourth of July for the two hundred and thirty-third time. I hope we celebrate the return of our rights.

Monday, September 15, 2008

US to Expel Venezuela Envoy~Al Jazeera


Chavez has for a long time been a fierce
critic of the US [AFP]

Washington has said it plans to expel Venezuela's ambassador and freeze the assets of two Venezuelan government officials as diplomatic tensions grew between the US, Venezuela and Bolivia.

Friday's follow an order by Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan president, for the US ambassador in Venezuela to leave the country.

"We have informed the Venezuelan ambassador to the United States that he will be expelled and that he should leave the United States," Sean McCormack, a state department spokesman, said on Friday.

"This reflects the weakness and desperation of these leaders as they face internal challenges, and an inability to communicate effectively internationally in order to build international support," he added.

The moves came after the US expelled the Bolivian ambassador to Washington, which in turn came after Evo Morales, the Bolivian president, expelled the US ambassador from La Paz, accusing him of instigating violent protests in Bolivia.

The expulsions have sparked a diplomatic crisis in North and South America.

On Friday, Honduras said it would indefinitely postpone accrediting the US ambassador in support of Bolivia and Venezuela.

Bolivia crisis

At least eight people were killed on Thursday in clashes between anti-government protesters and Morales' supporters.

Protests have erupted in several
regions of Bolivia [Reuters]
Morales had earlier accused the US ambassador to Bolivia of supporting protests by led by rebel state governors demanding greater autonomy and opposing Morales' plans to give more land to the poor.

"Charges levelled against our fine ambassadors by the leaders [of] Bolivia and Venezuela are false and the leaders of those countries know it," McCormack said.

On Friday, protests that have continued for several days abated, although tensions remained high.

Despite having earlier ruled out an armed response to the protests, Morales government imposed martial law in the eastern province of Pando on Friday, as demonstrations there contined.

Tit-for-tat expulsions

The US treasury department said the Venezuelan officials whose assets were frozen on Friday were bing targeted as they were believed to have ties to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

The US sanctions and Chavez's threat to halt oil sales to the US plunged ties between the two their lowest point in years.

The diplomatic row highlights the souring relations between the US and South American countries.

Chavez gave Patrick Duddy, the US envoy in Caracas, 72 hours to leave the country, making the announcement on state television and saying at the time that he would be recalling his ambassador from Washington.

He made the announcement hours after saying that his government had detained a group he said were involved in a US-backed plot to overthrow him.

Chavez's critics accuse him of trying to create instability in an attempt to shore up what they say is his plummeting popularity ahead of elections.

Russian bombers

Russia has sent two strategic bombers to
Venezuela [EPA]
Tensions between the US and Venezuela had already risen after Russia sent two strategic bombers to Venezuela for military exercises.

Chavez said the aircraft had arrived to counter US influence in the region.

The Russian move is reported to be Moscow's first strategic deployment in the Western hemisphere since the end of the Cold War and comes amid increased tensions between Russia and the US over the recent conflict with Georgia.

Moscow remains angry that US used military vessels to carry aid to Georgia during Russia's intervention there.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies